Maintenance Effectiveness      back

We analyse then address the causes of planned and unplanned downtime, while improving the way your organisation responds to downtime events.

Summary of Most Recent Maintenance Results

At one site all three levers of downtime were tackled, resulting in a 58% reduction in downtime from the baseline (average of past 12 months). This was done in the last year of a 5 year campaign life

At a second site unplanned maintenance and operations downtime were tackled, resulting in a 53% reduction in downtime from the baseline (average of past 12 months).

At company A, maintenance spend was reduced by 37% and capital spend by 14%, whilst concurrently increasing availability and reliability to deliver a 20% production increase

At company B, maintenance spend was held constant, whilst concurrently increasing availability and reliability to deliver a 35% production increase

At company C, maintenance spend was reduced by 12% and capital spend by 44%, whilst concurrently increasing availability and reliability to deliver a 25% production increase

Maintenance Spend: PIP has helped smelters to reduce maintenance spend by up to 37% even when production increasing

Back to top